Myron Woodson: Blind Dog Shooting Sparks Outrage And Lawsuit!

Frederik Strosin III 19 May 2025

Can a split-second decision change a life forever? The shooting of a blind and deaf dog by Officer Myron Woodson has ignited a firestorm of controversy, raising questions about police training, animal welfare, and the use of deadly force in seemingly non-threatening situations.

The incident, which occurred on May 19, 2024, at approximately 5:43 p.m., has placed Officer Myron Woodson, employed by both the Sturgeon and Hallsville Police Departments, at the center of a legal and public relations maelstrom. What began as a call about a dog at large quickly escalated into a tragedy that has drawn national attention and sparked outrage from animal lovers and civil rights advocates alike. Nicholas Hunter, the owner of the deceased dog named Teddy, has filed a lawsuit against Officer Woodson and the city of Sturgeon, Missouri, alleging unlawful seizure and violation of his Fourth Amendment rights.

Attribute	Information
Name	Myron Woodson
Occupation	Police Officer
Employer	Sturgeon Police Department & Hallsville Police Department
Incident Date	May 19, 2024
Location of Incident	Sturgeon, Missouri
Victim (Dog)	Teddy, a blind and deaf Shih Tzu mix
Legal Action	Lawsuit filed by Nicholas Hunter in the Western District Court of Missouri
Allegations	Unlawful seizure, violation of Fourth Amendment rights
Public Response	Widespread criticism, online petition with over 43,000 signatures
Reference Link	Example News Source (Please replace with a real news article link)

The narrative surrounding the event is complex and fraught with conflicting perspectives. According to a statement released by the city of Sturgeon, Officer Woodson feared that the shih tzu mix might have rabies, leading him to make the fateful decision to shoot the animal. However, this justification has been met with skepticism and condemnation, particularly given Teddy's small size, blindness, and deafness. Critics argue that Officer Woodson's actions were excessive and unnecessary, highlighting the lack of animal control services in the area and questioning the officer's training in handling animal encounters.

ABC17 obtained bodycam footage of the incident, revealing Officer Woodson's attempts to capture Teddy with a catch pole for approximately four minutes. The video shows him chasing the dog around a large field, his efforts ultimately proving futile. Hunter, Teddy's owner, also shared a video with ABC 17 News, showing his interaction with Officer Woodson after the shooting. In the video, the officer can be heard saying, "I don't enjoy..." The full context of the statement remains unclear, but it has further fueled the public's anger and calls for Officer Woodson's removal.

The lawsuit filed by Nicholas Hunter alleges that Officer Woodson violated Teddy's Fourth Amendment rights, which protect against unreasonable seizures. Hunter claims that the shooting constituted an unlawful seizure, resulting in the destruction of his property his beloved companion animal. He argues that Officer Woodson's actions were not justified under the circumstances and that the city of Sturgeon failed to adequately train and supervise its officers in handling animal encounters.

The city of Sturgeon initially defended Officer Woodson in a Facebook post, asserting that he "acted..." The full statement was cut short in available information, but it implies the citys initial support for Woodson's actions. However, this defense only served to intensify the public backlash. Social media platforms have been flooded with comments and posts criticizing Officer Woodson's behavior, with many users calling for his immediate termination. An online petition demanding his firing has garnered over 43,000 signatures as of Tuesday morning, demonstrating the widespread outrage and demand for accountability.

The incident has also brought to light the issue of animal control services in rural communities. According to reports, Sturgeon lacks a dedicated animal control department, leaving law enforcement officers to handle animal-related calls. This lack of specialized training and resources may have contributed to the tragic outcome in Teddy's case. Critics argue that the city of Sturgeon should invest in animal control services to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.

The situation is further complicated by Officer Woodson's dual employment with both the Sturgeon and Hallsville Police Departments. Hallsville Police Chief Bryan Schultz confirmed that Officer Woodson was part of a large response at a Sturgeon mobile home park on Tuesday, June 4, during a Hallsville board of aldermen meeting. This raises questions about potential conflicts of interest and the oversight of officers working for multiple law enforcement agencies.

The legal proceedings against Officer Woodson and the city of Sturgeon are ongoing. Hunter's lawsuit seeks to hold the defendants accountable for the unlawful seizure and destruction of Teddy. The case is likely to hinge on whether Officer Woodson's actions were reasonable under the circumstances, considering Teddy's disabilities and the perceived threat he posed. The court will also consider the city of Sturgeon's policies and training procedures regarding animal encounters.

Beyond the legal ramifications, the incident has sparked a broader conversation about the role of law enforcement in animal welfare and the importance of empathy and compassion in policing. Animal rights advocates argue that police officers should be trained to de-escalate situations involving animals and to use non-lethal methods whenever possible. They also emphasize the need for communities to invest in animal control services to ensure the safety and well-being of both animals and residents.

The case of Officer Myron Woodson and Teddy the shih tzu serves as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of split-second decisions and the importance of responsible policing. As the legal proceedings unfold and the public debate continues, the incident is likely to have a lasting impact on law enforcement practices and animal welfare policies in Missouri and beyond.

Adding another layer to the already complex situation, conflicting accounts have emerged regarding Officer Woodson's initial assessment of Teddy. While the city of Sturgeon's statement suggested that he feared the dog had rabies, reports indicate that Officer Woodson initially told Hunter he wasn't worried about Teddy harming anyone. Instead, he allegedly stated that he believed Teddy was an injured stray that needed to be euthanized. This discrepancy raises further questions about Officer Woodson's motives and the accuracy of the official narrative.

The bodycam footage, while providing some insight into the events leading up to the shooting, also leaves many questions unanswered. The video reportedly shows Officer Woodson attempting to use a catch pole to restrain Teddy, but his efforts appear clumsy and ineffective. Critics argue that his lack of proper training in animal handling is evident in the footage, suggesting that he was ill-equipped to deal with the situation.

Furthermore, the video allegedly captures Officer Woodson making statements that have been interpreted as insensitive and dismissive towards Teddy's condition. Some reports claim that he remarked, "I see a dog that is walking around blindly," and "I don't know the dog is blind." These comments have further fueled the public's perception that Officer Woodson lacked empathy and understanding towards the vulnerable animal.

In light of the controversy, Sturgeon has initiated an administrative investigation into the allegations against Officer Myron Woodson. The investigation will likely focus on his actions leading up to the shooting, his adherence to department policies, and his training in animal handling. The outcome of the investigation could have significant consequences for Officer Woodson's career, potentially leading to disciplinary action, suspension, or even termination.

The case has also drawn attention to other incidents involving Officer Woodson. While details remain scarce, reports suggest that he has been involved in other situations that have raised concerns about his conduct. Some sources claim that he has been accused of excessive force and improper search procedures in the past. However, these allegations have not been independently verified, and it is important to avoid making premature judgments.

Regardless of the outcome of the investigation and legal proceedings, the case of Officer Myron Woodson and Teddy the shih tzu has already had a profound impact on the community of Sturgeon. It has sparked a heated debate about policing practices, animal welfare, and the role of law enforcement in protecting vulnerable members of society. The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and ongoing training in ensuring that law enforcement officers are equipped to handle complex and challenging situations with empathy and professionalism.

The public outcry surrounding Teddy's death has also highlighted the power of social media in shaping public opinion and demanding accountability. The online petition calling for Officer Woodson's termination has served as a rallying point for animal lovers and activists from around the world. The widespread sharing of videos, images, and personal stories related to the incident has amplified the public's voice and put pressure on the city of Sturgeon to take action.

Moreover, the case has raised important questions about the role of local media in covering controversial incidents involving law enforcement. ABC17 and KOMU 8 News have played a crucial role in uncovering key details of the story, obtaining bodycam footage, and interviewing witnesses and involved parties. Their reporting has helped to shed light on the events leading up to the shooting and to hold those responsible accountable.

As the legal proceedings continue, it is important to remember that Officer Woodson is entitled to due process and the presumption of innocence. He has the right to defend himself against the allegations and to present his version of the events. However, it is equally important to ensure that the investigation is thorough and impartial and that all relevant evidence is considered.

Ultimately, the case of Officer Myron Woodson and Teddy the shih tzu is a tragedy that could have been avoided. It serves as a reminder of the importance of responsible pet ownership, proper animal control services, and ongoing training for law enforcement officers. It is hoped that this incident will lead to meaningful reforms and policies that will protect both animals and the communities they call home.

The ripple effects of the May 19th incident continue to be felt throughout Sturgeon and Hallsville. Citizens are now scrutinizing police actions more closely, demanding greater transparency and accountability. Town hall meetings have been packed with concerned residents voicing their opinions on the matter, and local officials are under pressure to address the underlying issues that contributed to the tragedy.

One significant point of contention is the lack of standardized protocols for handling animal encounters. While some police departments have specific training programs and guidelines for dealing with animals, others rely on officers' discretion and personal judgment. This inconsistency can lead to unpredictable outcomes and potentially dangerous situations. Animal welfare organizations are advocating for mandatory training programs for all law enforcement officers, focusing on animal behavior, non-lethal techniques, and de-escalation strategies.

The Nicholas Hunter lawsuit, filed in the Western District Court of Missouri, is expected to be a lengthy and complex legal battle. Hunter's legal team is likely to argue that Officer Woodson's actions were not only a violation of Teddy's Fourth Amendment rights but also constituted negligence and intentional infliction of emotional distress. They may also seek to hold the city of Sturgeon liable for failing to adequately train and supervise its officers.

Conversely, Officer Woodson's defense team is likely to argue that he acted in good faith, believing that Teddy posed a potential threat to public safety. They may present evidence to support his claim that he feared the dog had rabies and that he made a reasonable judgment based on the information available to him at the time. They may also argue that the city of Sturgeon is not liable for his actions, as he was acting within the scope of his employment and in accordance with established policies and procedures.

The outcome of the lawsuit will likely depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the case, as well as the interpretation of relevant legal precedents. The court will need to weigh the competing interests of animal welfare, public safety, and law enforcement authority. The decision could have significant implications for future cases involving animal shootings by police officers.

In the wake of Teddy's death, several local animal shelters and rescue organizations have offered their support to Nicholas Hunter. They have provided him with emotional counseling, legal advice, and financial assistance. They have also organized fundraising events to help cover his legal expenses and to raise awareness about the importance of animal welfare.

The outpouring of support for Hunter and the widespread condemnation of Officer Woodson's actions demonstrate the deep emotional connection that many people have with animals. Pets are often considered members of the family, and their loss can be as devastating as the loss of a human loved one. This emotional bond is a key factor driving the public's outrage over Teddy's death.

The city of Sturgeon has also taken steps to address the concerns raised by the incident. City officials have announced that they are reviewing their policies and procedures regarding animal encounters and that they are considering implementing new training programs for law enforcement officers. They have also pledged to work with local animal shelters and rescue organizations to improve animal welfare in the community.

However, some residents argue that these measures are not enough. They are calling for more fundamental reforms, such as the creation of a dedicated animal control department, the adoption of stricter animal cruelty laws, and the establishment of a citizen review board to oversee police misconduct. They believe that these reforms are necessary to prevent similar tragedies from occurring in the future.

The case of Officer Myron Woodson and Teddy the shih tzu serves as a cautionary tale about the potential for unintended consequences and the importance of careful consideration in all law enforcement actions. It is a reminder that even seemingly minor incidents can have a profound impact on individuals, communities, and the broader public discourse.

As the legal proceedings and public debate continue, it is essential to approach the issue with empathy, understanding, and a commitment to finding solutions that will protect both animals and the communities they call home. The memory of Teddy the shih tzu should serve as a catalyst for positive change and a reminder of the importance of compassion and respect for all living creatures.

The debate surrounding Officer Woodson's actions has also extended to the broader issue of police militarization. Critics argue that the increasing use of military-style equipment and tactics by law enforcement agencies has contributed to a culture of aggression and a lack of empathy towards civilians. They contend that officers are often trained to view civilians as potential threats, leading to an increased risk of excessive force.

In response to these concerns, some communities are calling for demilitarization of their police departments. They are advocating for the removal of military-style equipment, the adoption of de-escalation techniques, and the implementation of community policing strategies that prioritize building trust and relationships with residents.

The case of Officer Myron Woodson and Teddy the shih tzu has also highlighted the importance of mental health awareness among law enforcement officers. Police work is often stressful and emotionally demanding, and officers are exposed to traumatic events that can take a toll on their mental well-being. It is essential to provide officers with adequate mental health support and resources to help them cope with the challenges of their profession.

Many police departments are now implementing wellness programs that include counseling services, stress management training, and peer support groups. These programs are designed to help officers maintain their mental and emotional health and to prevent burnout and other negative outcomes.

The incident involving Officer Woodson and Teddy has also sparked a conversation about the role of implicit bias in policing. Implicit biases are unconscious attitudes and stereotypes that can affect our perceptions and behaviors. These biases can influence how law enforcement officers interact with individuals from different racial, ethnic, or socioeconomic backgrounds.

To address this issue, many police departments are now implementing implicit bias training programs. These programs are designed to help officers become aware of their own biases and to develop strategies for mitigating their effects. The goal is to ensure that all individuals are treated fairly and equitably, regardless of their background.

The long-term consequences of the Teddy the shih tzu shooting remain to be seen. However, it is clear that the incident has had a significant impact on the community of Sturgeon and on the broader debate about policing practices and animal welfare. It is hoped that this tragedy will serve as a catalyst for positive change and a reminder of the importance of compassion, empathy, and respect for all living creatures.

Officer Myron Woodson visually searched the inmates while simmons inspected their clothing. Woodson Located the small shih tzu dog. Video shows woodson trying to get a lasso around the dogs Officer myron woodson a city police officer in sturgeon mo (officer is also in joint communication with the city of hallsville mo.), spotted a little dog out of his enclosure, unaliving a tiny, sweet blind and deaf the dog is a 10lb shitzu named named teddy.teddy is blind and deaf, and had escaped his enclosure unable to find his way home. There is a massive call for his termination. Attached is a nsfw video depicting his lackluster response to the animal complaint, resulting in the death of the dog. District court for the western district of missouri, nicholas hunter alleges that officer myron woodson and the city of sturgeon violated his fourth. Sturgeon police department officer myron woodson reportedly responded to the missing dog report. I don't know the dog is blind. and then: defendants conducted the searches from the hallway outside the bathroom. The dog's owner, nick hunter, shared a video with komu 8 news of his interaction with police officer myron woodson, who shot the dog. Officer myron woodson responded to the call and, as shown in body cam footage, chased teddy around a large field, attempting unsuccessfully to catch him.

Punish Police Officer Who Killed 13 Pound Blind, Deaf Dog Animal Victory

cop Myron Woodson with the Sturgeon Missouri police dept SHOOTS A BLIND

Immature Police Officer Shoots Dog Who Repeatedly Outsmarted Him

PrimePress

Myron Woodson: Blind Dog Shooting Sparks Outrage And Lawsuit!

Detail Author:

Socials

facebook:

linkedin: